<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GFF Wing Gundam Early Type</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/11/10/gff-wing-gundam-early-type/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/11/10/gff-wing-gundam-early-type/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:20:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corrine</title>
		<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/11/10/gff-wing-gundam-early-type/comment-page-2/#comment-24207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corrine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunpla-inochi.com/?p=10552#comment-24207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. gunpla-inochi.com is great.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. gunpla-inochi.com is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muamar</title>
		<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/11/10/gff-wing-gundam-early-type/comment-page-2/#comment-21066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[muamar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunpla-inochi.com/?p=10552#comment-21066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i love gundam its so very cool]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love gundam its so very cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/11/10/gff-wing-gundam-early-type/comment-page-2/#comment-20575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunpla-inochi.com/?p=10552#comment-20575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow... to my own surprise, that WZ figure actually looks kinda good. Even the proportions. It reminds me of it in Endless Duel ^^. I remember my friend gave me a MSiA Heavyarms... the thing really was free of panel lines and it was just plain ugly xD.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; to my own surprise, that WZ figure actually looks kinda good. Even the proportions. It reminds me of it in Endless Duel ^^. I remember my friend gave me a MSiA Heavyarms&#8230; the thing really was free of panel lines and it was just plain ugly xD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siroh32</title>
		<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/11/10/gff-wing-gundam-early-type/comment-page-2/#comment-20544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siroh32]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunpla-inochi.com/?p=10552#comment-20544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, not necessarily a good thing since you&#039;ll be passing up some items that might be worth getting (but I&#039;m not you, so I can&#039;t speak to your taste), however, unless you want your second version of Wing Zero to have a pink beam saber and keep the first for parts (if possible), I doubt there&#039;s much value of having a first edition, unless you want to keep it in the box and then sell it for a thousand dollars a year later.  I&#039;m usually not that kind-of guy, though...

...In addition on the Wing front, I might also be on the lookout for some Leos (MSiA or model).  That&#039;s quite an underrated grunt MS, in my view.  But, GvGNP aside, I got my eyes on the TAG 1/144s, for now.  And some HGUCs (such as the Zakus, at least).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, not necessarily a good thing since you&#8217;ll be passing up some items that might be worth getting (but I&#8217;m not you, so I can&#8217;t speak to your taste), however, unless you want your second version of Wing Zero to have a pink beam saber and keep the first for parts (if possible), I doubt there&#8217;s much value of having a first edition, unless you want to keep it in the box and then sell it for a thousand dollars a year later.  I&#8217;m usually not that kind-of guy, though&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;In addition on the Wing front, I might also be on the lookout for some Leos (MSiA or model).  That&#8217;s quite an underrated grunt MS, in my view.  But, GvGNP aside, I got my eyes on the TAG 1/144s, for now.  And some HGUCs (such as the Zakus, at least).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceWhatever</title>
		<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/11/10/gff-wing-gundam-early-type/comment-page-2/#comment-20540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AceWhatever]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunpla-inochi.com/?p=10552#comment-20540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hear ya&#039;. I was so hoping an HCM Pro version would come out when they announced the new Wing figures, but in this hobby patience is a virtue. :p

Anyway I got my MSIA waaaaaaaaay back in December &#039;07 around the time it and the 1/60 kit were miraculously available at the same time from Hobby Link Japan. The MSIA&#039;s out of stock at the moment, so I guess it&#039;s not completely unobtainable right now if you&#039;re lucky.

And while I&#039;m at it, I got the 1/144 and 1/100 off of Tisinc99 from Amazon on April of last year back when they still had a ton of kits from the 90&#039;s.

I was interested in tracking down the 1st edition MSIA Wing Zero for a while but I decided to only look forward rather than backwards in this hobby.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear ya&#8217;. I was so hoping an HCM Pro version would come out when they announced the new Wing figures, but in this hobby patience is a virtue. :p</p>
<p>Anyway I got my MSIA waaaaaaaaay back in December &#8217;07 around the time it and the 1/60 kit were miraculously available at the same time from Hobby Link Japan. The MSIA&#8217;s out of stock at the moment, so I guess it&#8217;s not completely unobtainable right now if you&#8217;re lucky.</p>
<p>And while I&#8217;m at it, I got the 1/144 and 1/100 off of Tisinc99 from Amazon on April of last year back when they still had a ton of kits from the 90&#8242;s.</p>
<p>I was interested in tracking down the 1st edition MSIA Wing Zero for a while but I decided to only look forward rather than backwards in this hobby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siroh32</title>
		<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/11/10/gff-wing-gundam-early-type/comment-page-2/#comment-20539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siroh32]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunpla-inochi.com/?p=10552#comment-20539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, I almost forgot... How&#039;s that essay, Z? :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I almost forgot&#8230; How&#8217;s that essay, Z? :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siroh32</title>
		<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/11/10/gff-wing-gundam-early-type/comment-page-1/#comment-20538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siroh32]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunpla-inochi.com/?p=10552#comment-20538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ace, I can buy the explanation given.  But even though I&#039;m spoiled with EMSiAs and an HGUC (though not by much since it&#039;s a bulky GP02A with arms that can barely ever move without separating and needing reconnection), I go back to my GFF, NG 1/144, and older MSiAs a lot of the time.

As far as the MSIAs WGZ, I have the EMSiA WGZ ver. EW, and it can &lt;i&gt;barely&lt;/i&gt; hold the twin buster rifle together, and the last time I tested it (before I accidentally lost one of the triggers months back), it couldn&#039;t even hold the TBR separately.  I have a better chance of getting my GFF Wing to hold its buster rifle on its own again (though I never changed its pose from that).  The TBR for EMSiA WGZ is probably more proportionate than the MSiA TV versions of Wing and Zero.
I also have the U.S., panel line-deprived, non-transforming (and pink beam saber-wielding) version of Wing Gundam.  The wings can still spread out fine, it can easily hold its big buster rifle, though by now after much usage over the early and late parts of this decade, its knee &quot;joints&quot; might be a bit iffy (and definitely so for my Tallgeese II MSiA, and for my Heavyarms ver. EW, even though it can&#039;t spread out its legs much for a combative pose).  It doesn&#039;t have much articulation, though.  Earlier versions of MSiAs only connected from one part of the MS &quot;body&quot; to another with a single hinge (not sure that&#039;s the right term) instead of the two you can see on newer versions, like your WGZ.

Someone out there has modded it to get better articulation (and maybe stability), though:

http://blog.goo.ne.jp/somewhereinthenight/e/ebaf9b7b9c020b9f8ff2d06794defed1

Now even though I know one can&#039;t get &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; out of the box, I might still get it, after watching many GvGN videos and waiting for GvGNP to come out... (I&#039;m a sucker for winged units, sometimes.)  If the U.S. MSiA (second) version has better stability though, I&#039;m sure I&#039;d be hard-pressed to find it.  Where did you get yours, if I may ask?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ace, I can buy the explanation given.  But even though I&#8217;m spoiled with EMSiAs and an HGUC (though not by much since it&#8217;s a bulky GP02A with arms that can barely ever move without separating and needing reconnection), I go back to my GFF, NG 1/144, and older MSiAs a lot of the time.</p>
<p>As far as the MSIAs WGZ, I have the EMSiA WGZ ver. EW, and it can <i>barely</i> hold the twin buster rifle together, and the last time I tested it (before I accidentally lost one of the triggers months back), it couldn&#8217;t even hold the TBR separately.  I have a better chance of getting my GFF Wing to hold its buster rifle on its own again (though I never changed its pose from that).  The TBR for EMSiA WGZ is probably more proportionate than the MSiA TV versions of Wing and Zero.<br />
I also have the U.S., panel line-deprived, non-transforming (and pink beam saber-wielding) version of Wing Gundam.  The wings can still spread out fine, it can easily hold its big buster rifle, though by now after much usage over the early and late parts of this decade, its knee &#8220;joints&#8221; might be a bit iffy (and definitely so for my Tallgeese II MSiA, and for my Heavyarms ver. EW, even though it can&#8217;t spread out its legs much for a combative pose).  It doesn&#8217;t have much articulation, though.  Earlier versions of MSiAs only connected from one part of the MS &#8220;body&#8221; to another with a single hinge (not sure that&#8217;s the right term) instead of the two you can see on newer versions, like your WGZ.</p>
<p>Someone out there has modded it to get better articulation (and maybe stability), though:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.goo.ne.jp/somewhereinthenight/e/ebaf9b7b9c020b9f8ff2d06794defed1" rel="nofollow">http://blog.goo.ne.jp/somewhereinthenight/e/ebaf9b7b9c020b9f8ff2d06794defed1</a></p>
<p>Now even though I know one can&#8217;t get <i>that</i> out of the box, I might still get it, after watching many GvGN videos and waiting for GvGNP to come out&#8230; (I&#8217;m a sucker for winged units, sometimes.)  If the U.S. MSiA (second) version has better stability though, I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;d be hard-pressed to find it.  Where did you get yours, if I may ask?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/11/10/gff-wing-gundam-early-type/comment-page-1/#comment-20532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunpla-inochi.com/?p=10552#comment-20532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for letting me know ^^;. Long comments are no problem (just look at all the essays Siroh wrote) but wordpress automatically flags anything with more than two links. I&#039;m gonna give that pose a try in a bit...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for letting me know ^^;. Long comments are no problem (just look at all the essays Siroh wrote) but wordpress automatically flags anything with more than two links. I&#8217;m gonna give that pose a try in a bit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceWhatever</title>
		<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/11/10/gff-wing-gundam-early-type/comment-page-1/#comment-20531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AceWhatever]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunpla-inochi.com/?p=10552#comment-20531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both I guess.

I think people should be able to see it now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both I guess.</p>
<p>I think people should be able to see it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siroh32</title>
		<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/11/10/gff-wing-gundam-early-type/comment-page-1/#comment-20529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siroh32]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunpla-inochi.com/?p=10552#comment-20529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ace, did you use multiple links?  Or was it unusually long (akin to some of my comments)?  I never known for a comment that needed approval for the latter, but in the GFF section, I made a comment that had three links in it (originally going to be more), and it required moderation/approval.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ace, did you use multiple links?  Or was it unusually long (akin to some of my comments)?  I never known for a comment that needed approval for the latter, but in the GFF section, I made a comment that had three links in it (originally going to be more), and it required moderation/approval.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

