<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GFF Metal Composite RX-78-2 Gundam Ver. Ka</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/12/09/gff-metal-composite-rx-78-2-gundam-ver-ka/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/12/09/gff-metal-composite-rx-78-2-gundam-ver-ka/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:20:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siroh32</title>
		<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/12/09/gff-metal-composite-rx-78-2-gundam-ver-ka/comment-page-1/#comment-21358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siroh32]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunpla-inochi.com/?p=10874#comment-21358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You mean--as far as paint goes--if it holds its well-crafted beam saber or rifle, or if one of the forearms--in a pose--happens to scrape across the torso, that you have to say goodbye to a warning label and even some blue from the torso, and say hello to some blue on the forearm, or something?  I don&#039;t quite get it specifically, since I never had any trouble with paint coming off of my GFF Wing.

As far as &quot;being soft&quot; goes, I meant that you were just going to take pictures of it just standing there and no more; as if you were taking pictures of the 1/1 Gundam statue at Odaiba (and lighting in plenty of the photos seems kind-of like as if you were, say, taking photos of a Katoki-styled 1/1 statue at night), rather than try and even get it to do basic poses, which you did later on.  I would&#039;ve tried doing that, even if I thought (given what everyone thinks about GFFs) that even moving its right arm a bit would destroy its ability to pose forever and it can&#039;t hold its beam rifle anymore and the sky is falling and so on and so forth (okay, you weren&#039;t crazy like that, but it&#039;s the general impression I get when you review GFFs other than Wing, which I have and tend to agree with your review on).  It&#039;s kind-of like when [Insert Anyone Reading This Here]&#039;s parents would be scolding him/her about playing with the lock on the door of a car or with the buttons operating the windows or something, even though some abuse for a short period of time doesn&#039;t do much of anything at all to the lock on the car doors, or its windows if the kid pushes the buttons.  GFFs may be fragile-but-good-looking figures, but are they really so very fragile that you can&#039;t really do much of anything at all?  It feels like then you should be endorsing the MG RX-78 ver. Ka and have B-Club make replacement parts to make it sleeker and more accurate to Katoki&#039;s lineart.  Or endorse kitbashes or conversion kits of HGUCs to make a 1/144 RX-78 ver. Ka model (both of which I&#039;ve seen online before).

I mean, I display my models and figures and rarely touch half of them most of the time, but isn&#039;t half the fun&#039;s getting them to pose (and maybe taking photos of them in poses)?  And you do that for your Gunpla (at least with the better/more modern ones).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean&#8211;as far as paint goes&#8211;if it holds its well-crafted beam saber or rifle, or if one of the forearms&#8211;in a pose&#8211;happens to scrape across the torso, that you have to say goodbye to a warning label and even some blue from the torso, and say hello to some blue on the forearm, or something?  I don&#8217;t quite get it specifically, since I never had any trouble with paint coming off of my GFF Wing.</p>
<p>As far as &#8220;being soft&#8221; goes, I meant that you were just going to take pictures of it just standing there and no more; as if you were taking pictures of the 1/1 Gundam statue at Odaiba (and lighting in plenty of the photos seems kind-of like as if you were, say, taking photos of a Katoki-styled 1/1 statue at night), rather than try and even get it to do basic poses, which you did later on.  I would&#8217;ve tried doing that, even if I thought (given what everyone thinks about GFFs) that even moving its right arm a bit would destroy its ability to pose forever and it can&#8217;t hold its beam rifle anymore and the sky is falling and so on and so forth (okay, you weren&#8217;t crazy like that, but it&#8217;s the general impression I get when you review GFFs other than Wing, which I have and tend to agree with your review on).  It&#8217;s kind-of like when [Insert Anyone Reading This Here]&#8216;s parents would be scolding him/her about playing with the lock on the door of a car or with the buttons operating the windows or something, even though some abuse for a short period of time doesn&#8217;t do much of anything at all to the lock on the car doors, or its windows if the kid pushes the buttons.  GFFs may be fragile-but-good-looking figures, but are they really so very fragile that you can&#8217;t really do much of anything at all?  It feels like then you should be endorsing the MG RX-78 ver. Ka and have B-Club make replacement parts to make it sleeker and more accurate to Katoki&#8217;s lineart.  Or endorse kitbashes or conversion kits of HGUCs to make a 1/144 RX-78 ver. Ka model (both of which I&#8217;ve seen online before).</p>
<p>I mean, I display my models and figures and rarely touch half of them most of the time, but isn&#8217;t half the fun&#8217;s getting them to pose (and maybe taking photos of them in poses)?  And you do that for your Gunpla (at least with the better/more modern ones).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/12/09/gff-metal-composite-rx-78-2-gundam-ver-ka/comment-page-1/#comment-21344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunpla-inochi.com/?p=10874#comment-21344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[siroh, correction taken on the background of the GFF. What you mean by &quot;too soft&quot; on it? xD Also, I&#039;m no design critic so I don&#039;t really notice all the design differences you&#039;re pointing out (until I specifically look at it)... hence I also don&#039;t nitpick ^^;. As long as it looks &quot;sleek&quot; and my eyes like it, then the design works for me ^^. This GFF does well in being a &quot;ver. ka&quot; in terms of its proportions methinks. As for the paint, I wasn&#039;t referring to it scraping off my finger (that is no issue) but when painted parts rub on painted parts... ya know, results are obvious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>siroh, correction taken on the background of the GFF. What you mean by &#8220;too soft&#8221; on it? xD Also, I&#8217;m no design critic so I don&#8217;t really notice all the design differences you&#8217;re pointing out (until I specifically look at it)&#8230; hence I also don&#8217;t nitpick ^^;. As long as it looks &#8220;sleek&#8221; and my eyes like it, then the design works for me ^^. This GFF does well in being a &#8220;ver. ka&#8221; in terms of its proportions methinks. As for the paint, I wasn&#8217;t referring to it scraping off my finger (that is no issue) but when painted parts rub on painted parts&#8230; ya know, results are obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dredhawk</title>
		<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/12/09/gff-metal-composite-rx-78-2-gundam-ver-ka/comment-page-1/#comment-21330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dredhawk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunpla-inochi.com/?p=10874#comment-21330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL strangling Gundam with his own Gundam hammer]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL strangling Gundam with his own Gundam hammer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siroh32</title>
		<link>http://gunpla-inochi.com/2009/12/09/gff-metal-composite-rx-78-2-gundam-ver-ka/comment-page-1/#comment-21322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siroh32]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunpla-inochi.com/?p=10874#comment-21322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it seems Katoki didn&#039;t really succeed if the true goal was emulating the look of the 1/1 model from the Gundam Crisis attraction... Rather, I think the purpose was to apply the decals from that 1/1 model onto this figure, and replace the G-Fighter with the Hammers and javelin.  When reading the beginning of the review, I got the feeling that, based on your understanding of this specific GFF combined with your past history with GFF, I thought you were going to be a little too soft with it.  I expected you to be a little bolder with it, and you were when closer to the bottom of the review, so I&#039;m at least impressed with that...

The comparison pic in your review with your MG ver. Ka made me realize how much I shouldn&#039;t have concentrated on nitpicking how the MG&#039;s feet wasn&#039;t the traditional squared duck feet Katoki gave most Fed MS designs he retouched or made himself in the OYW period (as the feet of the MG doesn&#039;t look necessarily as bad in that specific angle of the first comparison image, though the last ones seem damning about it), and I noticed how some proportions (head, some areas of the legs, etc.) looked bigger or different, the positions of the arms, the way the legs look... It seems a little more &quot;cartoony&quot; in comparison to the MC (though fine somewhat aesthetically when compared to the 2.0, even though that MG is superior in articulation, if photos are any indication.

If I had an MC like this one, after reading your review here, I&#039;d still risk damage by having fun with it as I do my GFF Wing.  Granted, I haven&#039;t touched it after taking pictures of it holding its Buster Rifle on its own power (as higher priority of mine is looking for a missing part from my GP02A that I was fiddling with--some add-on to a stand--and also looking for a separate trigger for my EMSiA WGZ, though I think that&#039;s unfortunately lost for good), but I&#039;d still do it in the future as it&#039;s still too beautiful a design and something I&#039;d just like to do.  If messing with the paint is a valid issue others with GFF brought up, then maybe I haven&#039;t fiddled with my GFF enough for that to heppen... But why not just wear some rubber gloves when even touching GFF then, if it&#039;s that much of an issue?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it seems Katoki didn&#8217;t really succeed if the true goal was emulating the look of the 1/1 model from the Gundam Crisis attraction&#8230; Rather, I think the purpose was to apply the decals from that 1/1 model onto this figure, and replace the G-Fighter with the Hammers and javelin.  When reading the beginning of the review, I got the feeling that, based on your understanding of this specific GFF combined with your past history with GFF, I thought you were going to be a little too soft with it.  I expected you to be a little bolder with it, and you were when closer to the bottom of the review, so I&#8217;m at least impressed with that&#8230;</p>
<p>The comparison pic in your review with your MG ver. Ka made me realize how much I shouldn&#8217;t have concentrated on nitpicking how the MG&#8217;s feet wasn&#8217;t the traditional squared duck feet Katoki gave most Fed MS designs he retouched or made himself in the OYW period (as the feet of the MG doesn&#8217;t look necessarily as bad in that specific angle of the first comparison image, though the last ones seem damning about it), and I noticed how some proportions (head, some areas of the legs, etc.) looked bigger or different, the positions of the arms, the way the legs look&#8230; It seems a little more &#8220;cartoony&#8221; in comparison to the MC (though fine somewhat aesthetically when compared to the 2.0, even though that MG is superior in articulation, if photos are any indication.</p>
<p>If I had an MC like this one, after reading your review here, I&#8217;d still risk damage by having fun with it as I do my GFF Wing.  Granted, I haven&#8217;t touched it after taking pictures of it holding its Buster Rifle on its own power (as higher priority of mine is looking for a missing part from my GP02A that I was fiddling with&#8211;some add-on to a stand&#8211;and also looking for a separate trigger for my EMSiA WGZ, though I think that&#8217;s unfortunately lost for good), but I&#8217;d still do it in the future as it&#8217;s still too beautiful a design and something I&#8217;d just like to do.  If messing with the paint is a valid issue others with GFF brought up, then maybe I haven&#8217;t fiddled with my GFF enough for that to heppen&#8230; But why not just wear some rubber gloves when even touching GFF then, if it&#8217;s that much of an issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

